The Lab is live. 15 essays from the frontier of AI-native GTM.

Read

Article

v1.0

Live State: the foundation for AI-native GTM

How a shared, continuously updated understanding of every prospect, deal and customer changes the way commercial teams decide and act.

Daniel Remedios

Daniel Remedios

CEO & Founder

October 22, 2026

3

mins

What if your entire GTM operation shared a live understanding of every prospect, deal and customer?

This simple concept is core to the shift from AI-assisted → AI-native GTM.
And it's the keystone to an AI-native operation.

Let's break down what that understanding involves:

→ Buying intent, priorities, urgency
→ Relationships, stakeholders and influence
→ Deal momentum, risks and commitments
→ Customer adoption, sentiment and expansion potential
→ What's changed, why it matters and what should happen next

Today, this understanding is scattered.
Across systems, conversations, documents and people.

Marketing, Sales and Customer Success continuously piece it together to make decisions.

And increasingly, AI-assisted teams and agents are doing the same.

The consequences?

→ Reconstruction tax: repeatedly gathering and interpreting the same evidence
→ Inconsistency: different teams working from different understandings
→ Delay: recognising changes after the opportunity to influence them has passed

This exposes something fundamental about how we've designed GTM.

We've built systems to record commercial activity, while leaving the responsibility for maintaining understanding distributed across the organisation.

What if that understanding became part of the operating system itself?

This is the idea behind Live State.

A continuously maintained understanding of commercial reality, evolving as new evidence emerges.

→ Marketing recognises emerging demand
→ Sales understandings shifting deal momentum
→ Customer Success identifies changes in adoption and expansion potential

All working from shared State, with the ability to coordinate decisions and actions proactively.

This is the foundation of AI-native GTM.

An operating layer where people and agents can understand what's happening, direct attention, exercise judgement and act.

→ Less reconstruction
→ Less coordination
→ Earlier intervention
→ More consistent execution

And the ability to grow without the same proportional increase growth in operational complexity.

I’ve illustrated Live State through a single deal in the carousel 👇

But the implications extend across the entire commercial operation.

The future of GTM won’t be defined by who has the most AI agents or the smartest applications.

It will be defined by organisations that continuously understand what’s happening, coordinate decisions and actions across every function, and learn from the outcomes.

Those that learn and improve with every interaction will build an advantage that compounds.

And I think those are the companies that will win.

At Revenue Labs, we’re building the AI-native operating layer that makes this possible.

👇 I’ve illustrated how Live State works through a single deal in the carousel

💬 Curious about what the AI-native GTM could look like for your organisation? DM me
🔬 Or follow along as we explore the architecture, economics and implications of AI-native GTM

Slide contrasts an AI assistant saying a deal is on track with a Live Deal State view. The example is Alder Freight, an opportunity in evaluation with a £140,000 amount; the Live Deal State panel is deliberately blurred and asks what is happening, what has changed and what the best next action is. Headline: 'Bolt AI onto a stale CRM. Get the wrong answer faster.'
Alder Freight deal-state panel contrasts a CRM marked on track with a live-state assessment marked high risk. It lists late deliveries, Ruth as champion, a new CFO and procurement stakeholder, an extended spreadsheet workaround, slipping procurement timing and a recommended action to ask Ruth to start procurement this week. Headline: 'The CRM says on track. Live Deal State says at risk.'
The recommended action for Alder Freight is to ask Ruth to start procurement this week, based on a new buying-group member, a six-week review that has passed go-live and a workaround covering six more months. A timeline shows the rep calling Ruth, Ruth opening the request, the rep sending a security pack and procurement review starting. Headline: 'One recommended action. The rep took it that afternoon.'
Alder Freight's deal state a week later shows low risk after procurement clears before go-live and the spreadsheet workaround is retired. The panel says the CRM never saw the risk or traced what saved the deal, while Live Deal State tracks what changed, what worked and learns from each outcome.
An outcome-traced Alder Freight card says procurement joined the buying group, the rep got Ruth to start the same week, and review cleared before go-live. Below, connected Memory and Skills cards show version updates to Discovery and Qualification and Deal Qualification, with approved changes to start procurement evaluation earlier and raise deal risk if procurement has not started mid-evaluation. Headline: 'One rep saved one deal. Now every rep starts with it.'
A system diagram shows Alder Freight as one deal on a shared Operating Layer used by Rep, Manager and Leader. Context, Memory, Skills, Agent and Decision Traces sit above business evidence from CRM, meetings, email, product usage, support tickets, web research, knowledge, data enrichment and conversations; outcomes return to memory and skills. Headline: 'Every deal runs on this layer.'
Minimal closing slide reading 'Building an AI-native GTM system? I'd love to compare notes.'

Originally posted on LinkedIn

v1.0

This essay is versioned. Where our thinking develops materially, we will update the version and explain why - the revision history is preserved, not polished away.