ICP

One definition of who you win with: the accounts, segments and signals that qualify them, held as a versioned memory the whole system reasons against.

Learning from every outcome
FinServ 101-250 AMER holds the lowest churn in the base
4.2% churn, 67% below the 12.8% baseline
21 accounts, 32-day cycle
FinServ 251-500 EMEA is trending the other way
Churn up from 6.1% to 9.3% this quarter
3 accounts churned citing localised compliance
Upgrade proposedv18v19
LEARNING
The memory upgrades
Memory
ICP
v19
Industries: FinServ, Technology, Healthcare
FinServ 101-250 AMER promoted to High ICPv19
Size band: 101-250 seats performs best
FinServ 251-500 EMEA moved to watchlistv19
Low ICP: Professional Services 51-100 AMER
Approve upgrade to ICP?
The current way > AI added on > AI-native

The moments your ICP decides, and who's deciding it

The same definition gets used five ways a day. On the left it is a private memory, redefined by whoever is asked; on the right it is one governed record that every tool cites the same way.

01 | The Current Way

02 | AI Added On

03 | AI-Native

An account gets scored

Gut feel, per rep

Every rep scores against the ICP they remember. Five reps, five ICPs.

A score with no source

A scoring model grades fit against its own idea of good. Confident, unaccountable.

Scored against v18

Fit judged against the approved definition, and every score traceable to it.

The day's list gets built

Whoever's next

The list is alphabetical ambition, not fit.

Volume, faster

More accounts touched. The same wrong ones.

ICP accounts first

In-market accounts matching the memory, ranked and reasoned.

A campaign gets targeted

The old segment

Built from a filter someone saved last year.

Lookalikes of a guess

The audience expands from an unchecked seed.

The definition sales uses

One ICP across marketing and sales. The same memory, the same version.

A deal gets qualified

Qualified by optimism

Fit debated deal by deal, meeting by meeting.

Criteria on autofill

Criteria autocomplete. The judgement doesn't.

Fit with a trace

Qualification cites the ICP line it passed, or failed.

The ICP turns out wrong

A year of quiet misses

Nobody owns noticing. The deck stays wrong.

Wrong at machine speed

Every tool amplifies the stale definition, confidently.

A proposed v19

Closed-won patterns make the case for v19, and RevOps decides whether it replaces v18.

Referenced by

Capabilities that reason with this memory

Prospecting

Propensity

Active
Three accounts just moved into in-market
New funding and hires in the roles that feel this pain
Meridian Logistics jumps to the top of the list
Same profile as your last five closed-won deals, and hiring for the gap you fill
A contact at Northbridge is showing real intent
Visited pricing and a comparison page twice this week
+
Your ranked account list, ready for outreach
Who to call first, and the reason why
Priority accounts, ranked, before you start prospecting
SEE HOW IT WORKS

Prospecting

Daily Brief | Prospecting

Active
Six accounts moved in-market overnight
Flagged with what changed and why they're worth chasing
The right contact at Fenwick Systems, not the switchboard title
Picked from who's actually engaging, not the org chart
First email and LinkedIn message already drafted
Written to the pain they're showing right now, ready to send
+
Two prospects from last week gone quiet
Flagged to follow up before the window closes
Today's list ready before your first call
SEE HOW IT WORKS

Sales

Daily Brief | Sales

Active
Kestrel went quiet overnight
Champion didn't reply, and a new exec joined the thread
Two next steps from yesterday never got sent
Sitting overdue, and the deals are cooling while they wait
Solstice needs a follow-up before your 10am
Send it now, or lose the thread going into the call
+
Your three deals that need you today, ranked
In order of what's at risk and what moves the number
Your day, prioritised, before you open your inbox
SEE HOW IT WORKS
SEE ALL CAPABILITIES
Used by

Skills that use this memory

No items found.
SEE ALL SKILLS
The Platform

One system that understands, decides, acts and learns.

Every GTM signal flows through an AI-native operating layer into a system that runs on the surfaces your team already uses.

Explore the GTM System →
GTM Data & Knowledge
CRM · Emails · Calls · Marketing · Product · Support · Documents · Research
AI-Native Operating Layer
Context · Memory · Skills · Agents · Decision Traces
AI-Native GTM System
Understand
ICP Fit
Deal & Account State
Stakeholders
Risk & Health
Decide
Targeting
Pipeline & Forecast
Campaign Planning
Renewals & Expansion
Act
Outreach & Follow-up
Meeting Prep
CRM Updates
Alerts & Escalation
Learn
Upgrade ICP
Upgrade Messaging
Upgrade Playbooks
Upgrade Forecasting
Surfaces
CRM · Slack · Teams · ChatGPT · Claude · MCP · API
Output
Briefings · Artifacts · Alerts · Recommendations · Approvals · Actions

SEE WHY REVOPS + MARKETING LEADERS CHOOSE REVENUE LABS

The GTM teams that learn fastest will win. Build yours a system that learns.

An advantage competitors cannot buy back: years of success and failure, codified.

FAQ

What buyers ask

If it's not here, we'll answer it live.

Talk to us
What is an ICP memory in an AI-native GTM system?

One approved definition of who you win with, stored as a versioned record that both people and agents read from. Scores, lists and qualification all cite the same version, rather than each to its own remembered definition.

How is ICP memory different from a segment in the CRM?

A segment is a filter someone built once. ICP memory is a governed, versioned definition with a history, an owner, and a change record, applied consistently everywhere fit gets judged rather than saved once and left to drift.

How does AI use ICP without hallucinating fit?

By scoring against your approved version instead of inferring its own idea of a good customer. Every score cites the version it used, so a wrong result traces back to a definition you can inspect and correct.

Who updates the ICP when it stops matching reality?

RevOps, with the evidence in front of them. Closed-won and closed-lost patterns propose a new version; RevOps reviews it and decides whether it replaces the current one. The system never quietly redefines who you sell to.

How is ICP different from Persona?

ICP defines the company: firmographic and behavioural signals that indicate fit. Persona defines the person: who within that company you're speaking to, and how. A qualified deal needs both.